13
Dec
07

Dirty Pool, Hillary Style

hillaryredistribution.jpghillary-and-iraq-atudy-group1.jpghillary-bill-clinton1.jpg

It is getting nasty out there on the Presidential campaign trail. Today I seen some cold-blooded excrement perpetrated by the Hillary Clinton campaign. Her defamation shock troops Public Relations hustlers got a little game they play called handicap the opponent, in other words, character assassination.

According to Bill Shaheen, a national co-chairman of Clinton’s front-runner campaign, the Democrats should use a bit of judgment when it comes to picking their nominee, alluding to Obama’s previous drug use. The below excerpts are from this article.

Mr Shaheen indicated that much of Obama’s background is unknown and could be a problem in November 2008 if he is the Democratic nominee.

I know these jokers get paid fat-jack to bust up on they opponents, but damn. First of all, that same shit about unknown background could just as easily be levied on Hillary for keeping them millions of files hid from public scrutiny (despite numerous Freedom of Information Act requests) at the UFO heli-pad in Arkansas. She don’t want nobody to see them because she exercised shitty judgment and fucked up getting everybody health-care. But that is a small potatoes matter for now.

[Shaheen] also said that the Republicans would work hard to discover new aspects of Obama’s admittedly spotty youth.

Shaheen lied bald-face indicated that the real reason for bringing this shit up was that the “Evil Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy Machievallian Overlords” would find out some damaging shit to punk Obama with at a later date. Yeah, like they needed to do that when the Republicans obviously outsourced the hit-job to you. The strategy is to make Hillary look like she doing a brutha a favor by giving him a head’s up. Bull America.

That shit is wrong! You know damn well why you dogging that man with dirty ass tricks – cuz you about to lose Iowa. Taking a pre-emptive ruthless strike on a man, and telling him it is for his own good, is part-and-parcel of the Clinton hit-squad Modus Operandi though.

Billy Shaheen also was kind enough to give Obama a preview of the types of Vast Right-Wing Conspirator questions they would throw at his ass concerning his party-time days.

It’ll be, ‘When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?’ There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It’s hard to overcome.

There is a lot of openings for dirty tricks aight, especially when you slicing them open with a Cambodian jungle splitter you rotten bastard. Yeah, it is hard to overcome alright, hard to overcome your lying ass character-bombing. Hillary, and all them two-bit stooges of hers like Shaheen, need to be brought up on Campaign-Crime charges. Put my ass on that grand jury. To hell with a ham sandwich – just tell me where to sign the indictment.

Who needs a Right-Wing conspiracy when you got a fellow Democratic Senator putting the bullet in your back? I don’t even wanna go into the ’92 campaign and that triflin’ garbage that they fired at Big Bill (Willy J Puff-n-Stuff). But, to level some drug shit at a brother when you married to a dude who almost lost his ass on the campaign trail for the same thing? Hypocrisy abound in the age of the HildaBeast.

Oh hell naw, it gets better though. Clinton’s campaign said it had nuttin’ to do with Shaheen’s comments.

“These comments were not authorized or condoned by the campaign in any way,” spokeswoman Kathleen Strand said.

I promise you peeps, I swear on my everything, I do not make this shit up. You talk about some duplicitous, scheming, conniving, dirty-dog, kick you in the stones bull – this is it. She send one hit-man to fire the gat and get the press, and then she sends The Wolf to wipe down the crime scene. Them jokers is good, I give them that, but they don’t elude johnyypeeper’s microscopic scrutiny.

It would be one thing if Obama tried to hide his dope-taking past, but he wrote a book talkin’ about it in 1995.

Junkie. Pothead. That’s where I’d been headed: the final fatal role of the young would-be black man,” Obama wrote. Mostly he smoked marijuana and drank alcohol, he wrote, but occasionally he would snort cocaine when he could afford it.

Dig, I’m gonna be straight up with ya’ll. If them chemicals Obama was talking about was job-impairing, there is no way I could be stroking these keys with such rapid-fire precision. Yeah, Obama probably snorted enough bumps to fill a Caprice Classic trunk, but so the fuck what? He ain’t trying to lie on that shit. Besides, them feel-goods should be legal any damn way, but that is a post for another day.

No joke man, this stuff getting hectic. I just wish it was a fair match. Obama need to stand up to that stubby-leg Stalin and play the game to win it. I know he started off talking about the new era of decent campaigning, but that noise don’t compute when you dealin’ with a cold-blooded legacy-seeking power-junky.

***Update 12/13/07***

To add further fuel to the Hillary-engineered defamation fire, I found another subtly planted media-IED designed to make voters question Obama’s background. Paid political consultant, and Clinton’s Communications Director, Howard Wolfson, went on the Sunday news talk-show “Mace the Nation” on December 2 and said the following:

There’s a lot that voters don’t know about Barack Obama.

I don’t want to get all psychological on ya’ll asses, but that statement sounds a little like defense-mechanism projection on the part of Hillary and her PR bomb-dropping Luftwafe. By that I mean there is a lot we don’t know about her janky ass (which she intentionally shields from public scrutiny), but what better way to deflect inquiry or criticism than accuse your opponent of some baseless bullshit.

That ain’t all though. This a little matter of religious-based character assassination, in two separate incidents, conducted by two of Hillary’s campaign workers.The Clinton campaign slit their necks because they got caught doing it “requested the resignation” of two staffers after they sent false accusing Obama of being a Muslim. Hillbot campaign workers did this in an attempt to demonize him in the eyes of Christian voters. Here is an excerpt of one of the e-mails from the article:

“Let us all remain alert concerning Obama’s expected presidential Candidacy,” read the e-mail. “Please forward to everyone you know. The Muslims have said they Plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at The highest level.”

Whatever it takes to claw your corrupt, rotten, and now exposed ass to the top, eh Hill?


13 Responses to “Dirty Pool, Hillary Style”


  1. December 13, 2007 at 10:02 am

    Well said Johnny, I am kind of losing respect for her you know!

  2. 2 horatiox
    December 13, 2007 at 12:41 pm

    I hear you to some extent. Hillary’s sort of snitchy, and hypocritical, and corporate, probably even parties with Elliot Abrams or something. She however plays for keepsies: in the age of RealPolitik, normative ethics (one might even say bourgeois ethics) doesn’t really apply. Ratting out BO on his drug use may advance her cause; thus Ratting might useful (there are probably a dozen staffers working out the demographics on it), however hypocritical it seems to some of us in the cheap seats.

    Obama’s record leaves a lot to be desired though . Lately he’s been touring the fundamentalist Xtian churches, with a “Faith and Family tour” or something. As y’all say, what the F’s up with that? He sounds like a glib preacher; at the same time, the gated-communi-tay liberals love him and have thrown a lot of shekels into his war chest. He’s all about flash, charisma, oratory: that in itself provides reasons to choose someone else. I’m slightly for Edwards the country boy (tho’ he’s also sort of bogus), realizing that he doesn’t have much of a shot. But if Hill. gets the nom., I’ll vote Hill, more than likely (I actually admire Ron Paul –really quite an authentic secularist—however un-PC he has become among some Kossacks sorts–but it will probably be Don Ghouliani or a Xtian-goblin like Huck Mittromnabee for the GOPers).

    Johnnypeepers said:

    Thank for the post. First of all, I do not condone the practice of Realpolitik in my Representative Republic. From a utilitarian standpoint, what Hillary did is extremely effective, despite the near-universal condemnation of “smear campaign” tactics every election cycle.

    We, in the “cheap seats”, are the voters who determine who rises to power. Ergo, if we do not embrace a candidate’s use of the normative-ethical practice of “personal-attack” politics, we will reject them summarily. I intend to use this forum as a tool to call bullshit on candidates in order to mitigate the lack of journalistic integrity in the print, radio, and TV mediums.

    “He’s all about flash, charisma, oratory: that in itself provides reasons to choose someone else.”

    I noticed no mention of issues, substance, or platform-planks guiding your decision to reject a candidate. If you choose your candidate based on subjective personality traits, you get the government you deserve. My hope that the citizens will look at the issues, and the candidate’s words and actions, as a means to offset your arbitrarily-chosen vote.

    Thanks again for your comment.

  3. December 13, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    Wow Peeps. I wish everyone else in America were not so easily bamboozled. I have to shake my head at what the average american believes. I really don’t believe they do, I think sometimes the powers that be just puts out false info/poles etc. Perhaps I’m naive. But I can’t believe that grown people really go for the hype (Who really believed there were mass destruction weapons in Iraq (not anyone I know). Sorry for the degress… If you living in a glass house, don’t thow no stones. I’m starting to get off my Hillary for Pres bandwagon too. I really would like to see universal health care. I thought she was down, but maybe not.

  4. December 13, 2007 at 1:30 pm

    After President Bush and his VAST coke history got elected, I don’t see how Obama could possibly get taken to task by the republicans.

  5. 5 horatiox
    December 13, 2007 at 2:46 pm

    Obama has had no problem making appeals to Xtian fundamentalists (and at least on occasion to muslim groups–that shouldn’t cause some freeper-like paranoia, but it is an issue):. that’s relevant to his political platform, I believe. He also sounds a bit conservative on other issues, even on health care, when he seemed to insinuate that Hillary’s plan might not go over with the deep pockets of the insurance bidness. His suggestions a few months ago to attack Pakistan sounded about like something a McCain or other good ol’ boy would have said.

    HRC slamming Obama for recreational drug use may be ticky-tack and inconsistent (especially given what cons used to say about BC), but that’s sort of how the game is played—out in Norman Rockwell-land, BO’s image as pot-toking party boy might not go over well, even with mainstream “liberals”. If BO actually came out strongly for legalization and more libertarian ideas in regards to rec. drugs, I might be more tempted to join in the F**k Hill. campaign, but as far as I can tell, he has no intentions of doing that (the Clintons in fact made a few moves to decriminalizing drugs).

  6. 6 QB
    December 15, 2007 at 8:43 am

    Thanks for you comments Johnny.

    The very little news I watched in my Hotel room which all indicating that Obama is gaining ground in New Hampshire and Iowa. Hilary will not be good choice for Democratic Presidential candidate.

  7. 7 DIVAS
    December 16, 2007 at 5:53 am

    hey dude, u really seem to have some grey matter.
    But why spend it on poor Hillary?

  8. December 16, 2007 at 12:40 pm

    Well DIVAS,

    Thank you for your compliment. I used my post to talk about Hillary because I can. If you would like to set up a blog to talk about issues other than Hillary, you are free to do so.

    Oh, and Hillary’s net worth is 34.9 million dollars (http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/moneymag/0712/gallery.candidates.moneymag/index.html)

    I dunno what your classification method is for labeling people as poor or rich, but I think most would agree she does not fall into the ranks of the former.

    Be Sweet

  9. 9 Slim Poon
    December 17, 2007 at 10:37 am

    Hillary is a butch dyke with a scabies and crotch cricket infestation. No wonder Billy Boy didn’t lay a hand on her all those years. Of course, I can’t blame the man. Shit, I wouldn’t want to touch no chick that smelled like Icy Hot either. Now, find me a sweet honey that has a box full of cough syrup and we’ll call it a date.
    Fuck jimba wimba. That’s from the old language, meaning “Kiss My Ass”.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    I do not believe that adultery is justified if one’s wife is suffering from vaginal decay or an infestation of any sort. Hillary is, in my mind, a beautiful woman who deserves love and respect, despite her rotten cooter. When you make a vow before God, you obligate yourself to love and honor that person for the rest of your life. Assuming you are not married, I hope that you communicate your views regarding adultery and extra-marital copulation before you make this promise to your spouse and before the Lord.

  10. 10 Slim Poon
    December 17, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    I don’t owe your precious Lord or a woman a damn thing. Hear me, you stupid-looking, rat-face idiot? Look at your face, mofo. How the hell could you believe in the presence of a loving God with a mug like that? And I know you’re not tagging any ass unless it’s of the gutter-park crank whore variety.
    Don’t ever preach to me again, you irritating little prick or I’ll show you the meaning of damnation.

  11. December 18, 2007 at 1:00 pm

    She just lost it during one of the debates when she started chortling lik crazy on hearing a question put forward to Obama! He came back with a retort and shut her up though 🙂

  12. 12 no1plantman
    December 29, 2007 at 9:26 am

    Hillary is a bitch and I really cannot see anyone voting for Obama, what the hell is that kind of name anyhow?
    Hillary will sleep with satan himself to get an edge on the oposition, and Obama..well I’m still having issues with the whole name thing.

  13. 13 b1thought
    December 30, 2007 at 12:37 am

    right on bro ha!! i like you style!!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Johnny Peepers

----> is a socio-pathetic degenerate with a penchant for cheap booze, ruphy-laden broads, and dim sum soup.

a

Blog Stats

  • 1,079,063 hits

Archives


%d bloggers like this: