13
Mar
08

Satan’s House Band – The Misfits

misfits.jpg

Johnnypeepers has a long and sordid past. As a youth, I was a rebellious street-urchin (as described by me mum). I consciously defied authority at every available opportunity. One way to reject parental, societal, and moral constraints was to embrace evil Satanic music, which brings me to the subject of this post.

danzig.jpg fits.jpg

The Misfits were a wicked collection of lost New Jersey souls who wrote songs about demonic possession, alien sexual abuse of children, and violent misogynistic Hollywood B-movies. The band’s singer was Glenn Danzig, a gifted Italian-American operatic tenor, who could have given Pavarotti a run for his money.

Several of my teenage skateboarding friends had succumbed to the Liar’s musical ambassadors. They coerced me into listening to the Misfit’s destructive mind-corroding anthems. Despite their occult imagery and Satanic message, I still have a great affinity for their music.

bullet.jpg

Bullet” is the Misfit’s sonic masterpiece. As a sadistic and blood-thirsty bastard who obsesses over conspiracy theories and politics, this song is right up my alley.”Bullet” is one of the most bad-ass punk anthems ever put to wax. Whoever threw this video together deserves eternal accolades. Please check it out.

Warning: If you are uncomfortable seeing video footage JFK’s bloody skull remnants, or if the mental image of Jacqueline Lee Bouvier Kennedy Onassis slurping semen from someone’s palm disturbs you, please skip this portion of the post.

President’s bullet-ridden body in the street
Ride, Johnny ride
Kennedy’s shattered head hits concrete
Ride, Johnny ride

Johnny’s wife is floundering
Johnny’s wife is scared
Run, Jackie run

Texas is an outrage when your husband is dead
Texas is an outrage when they pick up his head
Texas is the reason that the presidents dead
You gotta suck, suck, Jackie suck

President’s bullet-ridden body in the street
Ride, Johnny ride
Kennedy’s shattered head hits concrete
Ride, Johnny ride

Texas is an outrage when your husband is dead
Texas is an outrage when they pick up his head
Texas is the reason that the presidents dead
You gotta suck, suck, Jackie suck

Arise Jackie-O, Jonathon of Kennedy
Well, arise and be shot down
The dirts gonna be your dessert
My cum be your life source
And the only way to get it
Is to suck or fuck
Or be poor and devoid
And masturbate me, masturbate me
Then slurp it from your palm
Like a dry desert soaking up rain
Soaking up sun
Like a dry desert soaking up rain
Soaking up sun

Horror Business” is another glorious Misfit’s track. The lyrics never made much sense to me, but that is why I love it. Something about a dude who doesn’t like other muthafuckas going into his bathroom. He even went as far as painting it black and keeping a knife by the door in case there was any confusion. This song straight up kicks ass.

Too much horror business
Driving late at night
Psycho ’78
My bathroom is new

You, you don’t go in the bathroom with me

Psycho ’78
12 o’clock, don’t be late
All this horror business
My mirrors are black

You don’t go in the bathroom with me

With you
I’ll put a knife right in you
I’m warning you
I’ll put a knife right in you
I’m warning you
I’ll put a knife right in you

Although I could not find a clip, “Hollywood Babylon” is a track that deserves an elevated position in the Punk Rock Pantheon. The song is based on Black Art sorceror Kenneth Anger’s Hollywood book that exposes the sordid affairs of the early big-screen stars. The lyrical money shot is – “Do the citizens kneel for sex? It’s heaven cummin’ on her chest.” The song reminds me of one of my all-time favorite flicks, “Sunset Boulevard.” That movie deserves an entire post. If you have not already seen it, do so immediately.

God does not allow the Liar’s seed to enjoy their evil Earthly reign in perpetuity. For example, Glenn Danzig was recently struck down by a soldier of Christ. The lead singer for the punk band “The Northside Kings“, Danny Marianinho (emissary of the Lord), was dispatched to knock Danzig da fuck out for his wickedness. This was a victory for true-believers everywhere. Enjoy the violence.

It’s okay for Christians throughout centuries to exterminate races and for their priests to rape little kids throughout decades, but trying to give the people the power to think and be individual, that’s evil? ~ Glenn Danzig


36 Responses to “Satan’s House Band – The Misfits”


  1. March 14, 2008 at 8:07 am

    Well, I don’t know what to say, Johnny! I would’ve found you to be a very disturbing/disturbed little kid, I guess! For sure, listening to a band singing about putting knives into someone, could lead to such action, could it not? by impressionable, emotionally disturbed, angry youth –or sick adults for that matter.

    Good parents won’t let this stuff into the house. We did not let our children have radios until they were in upper high school — just tape players –and Christian contemporary music. Then their father said if all he heard them listening to was Christian rock (or any other kind), he’d take the radios away. My kids are musicians/singers –2 teach it/ 3 could. Out of 4, All sing.

    They didn’t grow up with a taste for –or familiarity with –the sadistic rockers. So they probably can’t discuss pop music culture any more than I can. I’m sure God can use a redeemed past to open doors for the Gospel –which isn’t an excuse to or license to seek worldly/sinful experiences.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    Thank you for sharing Babs. Your assessment is correct, I am a disturbed soul with the Beast’s mark on my scalp. Regrettably, I did not have “good” parents like you and your husband. Had my parent’s censored my adolescent entertainment, I would be as vanilla and plain as I am sure your children are.

    Maybe this blog is not for your Barb. There are many “worldy/sinful experiences” that have been discussed here, and they will be discussed in the future. Please do not take my words the wrong way, I just do not want your soul corrupted. You have had a long uninterrupted Christian walk, and I would hate to see it unintentionally sabotaged.

  2. 2 Anonymous
    March 14, 2008 at 11:42 pm

    Aw, now, don’t call us “vanilla” and “plain.” sounds like an insult! We know how to have fun and we like entertainment. Just saw my daughter’s production of Soussical the musical –a joyous, fun show –tonight. Nothing boring about it or us –really!

    I don’t mind what you discuss, johnny. I’m sure that because of your colorful rather than vanilla past –and therefore your worldly knowledge –you attract people for whatever your real message is –I think you have a message –as in your post on porn –and posts of Christian witness. And do you really think you have the beast’s mark on your scalp – aren’t you a Christian? And if so, the devil doesn’t have his mark on you –anymore.

    I can’t comment knowledgeably about such music because I have no taste for it or experience of it. And my only concern would be to wonder, as I did, if such violent lyrics don’t inspire violence in vulnerable/impressionable people.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    I apologize if my comment came across as an insult. I will check for my Beast mark again, it has been a while since I last saw it so you may be right. As far as violent lyrics inspiring impressionable minds, so what? We will always have violent people in this world. I am not willing to give up my rights to voice or receive speech because others have abused their freewill. The fundamental human right to free expression is more precious to me than the random possibility of being a victim of violence.

    I assume you are in favor of censorship, no? If that is the case, who would you designate as the Chief of the Morality Police? I am sure he/she will protect us from sinful and violent thoughts. The World will be perfect and no one will ever sin again. Keep dreaming.

  3. March 15, 2008 at 9:45 am

    I would prefer self-censorship to the morality police. Children, the poorly parented, or the necessarily (or not) unsupervised kids and the weak-willed and weak-minded can be influenced adversely by some kinds of entertainment/teachings/etc. We have seen where the suicidal homicidal students who shoot up their schools have been steeped in violent rock music. Would they have gone so wrong if they had better influences —say, more vanilla influences?

    E.G. –it’s hard to preserve children’s natural innocence about sexual matters these days and let them have the naivety of childhood –because of TV with no effort to place explicit bedroom activity in hours when young kids ideally are in bed. also computer access. So many kids don’t have supervisory parents –in part because of the work demands on both parents. So they see things at younger ages –and hear them in lyrics –earlier than they would’ve, say, when I was a child –before
    R and X-rated TV, lyrics and computers.

    I myself really like Law and Order on tv–but I know there are crimes portrayed there that would be shocking, mind-blowing, to the innocent child–and frightening–terrible tortures. so we never have those shows on when children are present. We know there is copy-cat crime from viewing shows like this. Moreover, they often tell the crooks how to erase their dna evidence.

    You spoke of porn –I do think it should be criminal to make it and broadcast it anywhere or sell it. In that way, I am like a Muslim, I guess –but a better solution is for people themselves to voluntarily refuse to be in porn, make it, sell it and buy it.
    Better a change in the soul/and the heart and mind –than in the law.

    But we do have certain laws as protections for people in the categories I mentioned above. Laws also teach the masses a sense of right and wrong that they might not otherwise have. E.G. the law says unequivocally that incest and pedophilia and kiddie porn and bestiality are crimes. So most people still believe they are. And they are. But the law and society now says homosexual sodomy preference is good, something to celebrate with parades –even though it still poses a huge public health risk with the newly diagnosed HPV throat cancers and the Staph flesh-eating bacteria, resistant to antibiotics, afflicting gays in San Francisco with potential to spread to the general population through casual contact in hospitals. I think I read that thousands have died from this in the US lately. People like to say that AIDS is a hetero disease –but in the U.S. it started out as a gay disease and only spread to the general population through bisexuality, IV drug needle sharing, and blood transfusions –from the gay community to the straight. And it comes from the unsanitary nature of the activities and the promiscuity of the lifestyle. Not that hetero promiscuity and hetero oral sodomy isn’t carrying on the problem also. It may be that the food intake orifice and the waste eliminator orifices are NOT to be mixed after all –as God intended when he gave us noses and taste buds.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    “You spoke of porn –I do think it should be criminal to make it and broadcast it anywhere or sell it.”

    Please be kind enough to give me a legislative definition of “porn”. This way I can know whether or not I will be fined or imprisoned for watching or producing adult content. It needs to be a narrow definition so it will pass constitutional scrutiny.

  4. March 15, 2008 at 8:52 pm

    wow and I thought I was a bit twisted…… If ya woulda been my kid, Id have been packing you off for a psych eval asap.

  5. March 16, 2008 at 7:43 am

    You are a true stirrer. Are you sure you’re not Australian?

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    Nopers. Even if I was a POM I wouldn’t admit it. I would rather die in a vat of boiling seminal fluid than be an Aussie. Not that there is anything wrong with being Aussie, I am just glad that I am not from there.

  6. March 17, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    One judge famously said about obscenity –“I may not be able to define it but I sure know it when I see it.” (Or hear it, I might add.)

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    The Miller test has since displaced Justice Stewart’s subjective standard for identifying such matter. You said you would like pornography to be illegal (which is currently protected speech). If you were the Queen of the U.S., how would you define pornography in order to give the citizens fair notice so they might avoid fines and imprisonment?

  7. March 18, 2008 at 12:59 am

    erotic nudity –designed to arouse. However, I wouldn’t go after the buyers –just the manufacturers and the sellers. Nothing to fear if you don’t make and sell porn –or crack -or heroin –or crystal meth. Why do we think we HAVE to make and sell this stuff and look the other way when it happens?

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    How would you determine whether an artistic work is designed to arouse or not? Do you interrogate the creator? Maybe you could hook up a citizen up to some electrodes and check out the brain’s response to the work. Or you could do it the old fashioned way, look for a bulge in the britches.

  8. March 18, 2008 at 11:17 am

    While I dig the Misfits’ music, I was always more of a Black Flag guy myself. I’d also include The Dead kennedys in here, but Jello sometimes got a little odd for me (his side project Lard for instance).

  9. March 18, 2008 at 2:41 pm

    I am sorry–sincerely, respectfully sorry–that such evil, dangerous music exists.

    I’m not sure whether you will appreciate it or not, but I have prayed a simple prayer for your soul. I pray often for mine, and know we both know direction from God.

    I wish you well.

    Shirley Buxton
    http://www.shirleybuxton.wordpress.com

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    Thank you kindly Shirley. Your inner spiritual beauty and Christian kindness will not be forgotten. If only the government would have banned this music, I would not have suffered exposure to these sinful messages. Tipper Gore and the PMRC did their best to protect children from these evils. Unfortunately, they were unsuccessful and the Judas Priests’ and the Twisted Sisters’ (Satan’s pied pipers) of the World wreak spiritual havoc on many unsuspecting children every day.

  10. March 18, 2008 at 5:08 pm

    My Goodness Peeps! I scanned some of this post; but I’ll have to save most of it for when I get home on my home computer. If I keep visiting your posts at lunch time at my good government job, I’m going to end up having the whole wordpress put on the blocked list. And I don’t want to do that. They’ve already blocked me and everyone else from Fredericks and Victoria’s Secret. I can no longer buy their perfumes at lunch time. Anyway, I see you’re having a bad day today. All this VIOLENCE in your tone; you know that’s not you. Stop fooling yourself JP. You wouldn’t want some crazy, distorted person to take you seriously, now would you? Your words could invoke an instable person to go ballistic. There comes a time in all of our lives that we must make a choice. We must decide to shine our light and be creative and inspiring for goodness or continue on the path of darkness and destruction. Don’t let the evils of this world stop you from shining your goodness, JP. I’ll do all I can in my humanly power to persuade you otherwise, because I know how loving and lightbearing you really are. In the meantime, I’ll wait until I’m in the privacy of my own laptop to touch basis with my favorite mentor, JP.

    @Shirley – Please pray for JP. He’s not that bad. He’s really cool. He’s really a super good person, trying to make us aware of the evil so that we won’t ignore it. He’s just somewhat extreme and passionate on whatever he believes. And, he likes to put somethings to the extreme so that people will get his point and heed his warnings. But. . . that’s ok too. I Guess. . .? I’m praying for Johnny too Mrs. Shirley. I’m praying that JP will listen to the spirit of the Lord and do God’s will. If God’s will is for JP to SHOCK, frighten, antagonize, or anger humans into living abundantly in love by of ten showing the ills of sin, then so be it, who am I to judge. Certainly our collective prayers will be heard.

    Peace, Light and Love to you and yours. . . .

    CordieB.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    Sorry Cordie, maybe I need to put up a NSFW disclaimer on my posts. But then again, I would have to do that on all of them. Maybe so you don’t get in no trouble, it would be better to access Dillsnap Cogitations on your off time.

    What you doing looking at Freddies? Never mind, that ain’t my business. I wasn’t having no bad day with this post, just reminiscing. I cannot help how other folks take me. Besides, it ain’t my responsibility – they is in charge of theyselves. Nuttin’ is stopping me from light shining, I got a 100 watt bulb plugged up. I is light-bearing Cordie, so don’t worry.

  11. March 18, 2008 at 8:53 pm

    Johnny –people who make porn and sell it –know that it’s porn. That’s what would be illegal. We are stupid if we can’t prosecute it when we see it. It’s been defined as protected speech–that doesn’t mean it should be. Even a kid knows when he’s seeing a “dirty picture” –or a “naughty” picture. There is no redeeming social value to any of it.

    Same way with the violent and misogynous, suicidal, homicidal, drug-celebrating lyrics being marketed to youth.

    I don’t think it would be the death knell for freedom if a society decided some excesses were “beyond the pale” –and that “there oughtta be a law!”

    Mark my words –someday we will be celebrating the marriages of people to their pets and approving bigamy and polygamy and lowering ages of consent for sexual relations. More and more taboos and even illegalities are going to be popularized and legalized in the name of “freedom.” And people who stand against these things will be hated, marginalized, persecuted –just as in Bible times –both testaments.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    “We are stupid if we can’t prosecute it when we see it.”

    Who is “we”, and what is “it?” I need some definitions to work with here Babs. You are being way too ambiguous. We are talking about putting people in jail, do you understand that? Is there redeeming social value to “Ulysses” or “Lolita?” You are chartering a dangerous trek if you wanna go down that path. I saw some muff in “Revenge of the Nerds.” How you gonna tell me that isn’t art?

  12. March 18, 2008 at 9:17 pm

    Granted, it would be much nicer if people just voluntarily decided to de-fund the porn industry –if we could live by the law of love and not the law, per se. But the definition of love no longer includes a recognition of what “good” is –so that we have a consensus of what loving people will do or not do for each other’s good, the common good, godly good. We are so benighted, we no longer agree on the definition of good and evil –and we think that we cannot know –except for ourselves –but not for all. No objective truth –no objective standards of good and evil.

    With porn, is it good for the model/actors? If it is your daughter, do you want her to be a porn star/porn model? Good parents would not wish this on an enemy’s child. The Law of Love says porn is evil –and therefore if evil, why should the law protect it in the name of liberty?

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    “the definition of love no longer includes a recognition of what good”

    Who changed the definition of love and when? They did not seek my permission.

    “With porn, is it good for the model/actors?”

    I dunno, I cannot speak for them. I believe in individual liberty and the right to do whatever I wish with my body. I assume you want the state to intervene and restrict voluntary agreements. To me that is a tyrannical abuse of freedom. Who will be our dictator and author of the new-fangled moral proclamation? Unless J.C. rolls up after 7 years of anti-Christ beat-down, I don’t want no religious boss telling me how to live.

  13. March 19, 2008 at 9:48 am

    To love someone includes desiring what is good for them. Good law is for our good, not to repress or force uni-thought. I don’t love someone if I encourage her in prostitution or porn-making –which is a form of prostitution –selling one’s image/body for the adulterous lust of others. This is soul-corrosive. The Bible as much as says so. Harlotry is clearly disapproved in scriptures. As is “stumbling the weaker brother” causing him to sin by our actions. Granted, Jesus told the adulteress He didn’t condemn her as the other sinners wanted to do –but He also told her to “go and sin no more.” “Condemn” in this case would mean to wish damnation upon –or punish.

    John writes that Jesus didn’t come to “condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.” So He came to forgive –but He came preaching “Repent –for the Kingdom is nigh.” So we are to repent of sins –and we are all guilty. This is a universal “we” –no ambiguity here, Johnny P. The Bible does say, however, that Jesus will be the separator of the redeemed from the unredeemed, who did not believe in Him or repent or receive Him. He will be the judge, even though His function on the earth is to save, rather than condemn –to cover our sins –but also to free us for holiness through the cleansing power of the Holy Spirit.

    Responsible adults know that children need protection from influences that would stumble them, draw them into addictive, soul-corrosive sins of the flesh, including drugs. The weak-willed, poorly parented/poorly supervised, need protection. So laws restricting the manufacture and sale of porn (like drugs) would be protective of the girls forced into prostitution and sold as sex and porn slaves. It would also protect our teen boys from addictive inflamation of their already inflamed libidos. Porn indulgence is a serious sex addiction that even married men are prone to.

    I don’t think there is a thing wrong with telling stores that carrying porn magazines and sex videos is illegal and prosecuteable –or fine-able. It used to be that you could not readily, easily find porn or prostitutes just anywere –you would have to go seek them out and learn about them by word of mouth from others. You had to really walk in the dark to find the dark. then along came Playboy with the Playboy clubs and Hugh Hefner –and all of a sudden, sex exploitation was almost respectable –the stuff of legit entertainment –with married businessmen being served by the “bunnies. ” And then started the strip clubs, gay bath houses, swinging couples, all given an aura or respectability by journalists and Phil Donahue, who’s favorite line was, “Who are we to judge?” asked even of fathers on his show who had illicit relations with their daughters. And of course Jerry Springer’s show tells us of a sub-culture of depravity –as do so many of the reality shows featuring casual sex on dates, extreme cattiness and debauchery as almost laudable –at least natural –and people lack shame for the shameful!

    My husband, our siblings, I and my children have never been offered drugs or seen a transaction–and they went to public school and 2 have taught there. So illegality of drugs has kept them more or less underground. You have to hang with the users or seek it out to find the stuff. But my sons certainly had ample opportunity through internet to see porn. It came through MY computer in email years ago when AOL was the biggest internet service –before we knew how to filter it out –and there were explicit ads all the time which would entice men especially. Kids in suburbia heard of sex phone numbers and got hooked on the rush and ran up bills.

    NONE of this was prevalent before the hippie era –the free love generation. –which started in the 60’s but hit middle america in the mid and later 70’s and through the 80’s up to today –in the Sexual Revolution. Before they realized that not all STD’s were curable. Even my uncle who was in the Navy in WWII, (Yes, we heard of guys with a girl in every port –none of the sins are new) says that “cussing like a sailor” has been surpassed since his youth — immorality is more rampant –and we are a pornographic, immoral culture, more and more –as you can see by what we have on TV and internet, available to kids in homes unsupervised by moral adults.

    Culture has gone awry –and more and more we resemble the pagans of the 1st century and the Baal worshippers of Elijah’s day –who were alleged to have sex with their daughters and spill the seed on the ground to ensure a good harvest –and they sacrificed children to Molech –(as did other deities through the centuries around the world, including Aztec and Inca cultures) —

    God tied into man’s almost universal? urge to sacrifice something precious as an atonement for sins in hopes of appeasing the gods of nature — by sacrificing His own son –and then raising HIm up to reign as a triumphant king so that this Sunday we will hear, “Death, where is thy sting? Grave, where is thy victory?”

    He is risen; He is risen indeed. And in the meantime we should keep defining good and evil as the Bible does –and warning the world of the need to repent and believe in the One whom the Creator has sent for the remission of sins.

    Again, Law wouldn’t be necessary if our hearts were right, committed to Christ–but it is a teacher –and Jesus said the Law was important–but it can’t deliver us from sin. That’s why we need law enforcement –because the law doesn’t change the heart. But the law defines good and evil. And for that, the Law should be upheld –because just eliminating or changing the law does not eliminate our guilt. It just makes the masses of people think good is evil, and evil is good. I know this when I talk to Europeans –who, as a culture, no longer have any real awareness or knowledge or experience of the Saviour.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    “The weak-willed, poorly parented/poorly supervised, need protection.”

    Regarding pornography, would you support a legal ban on all erotic material? If so, how would you define what is erotic or pornographic? I have asked this question several times and have not received a sufficient response.

  14. 14 Manco
    March 19, 2008 at 11:54 am

    Barb: how does it feel to be the square peg in a round hole?

    Your beliefs are good, for you. Not for me or millions of other people. I’m an adult human being and if I make the choice to snort coke, look at porn, burn the flag or use the Bible to wipe my ass, that’s my choice. Do you understand choice at all, you brainless twit?
    What business is it of yours what I do, read, write, watch or take into my body as long as I do not harm another living being on this planet? I’ll provide the answer for you: none of your fucking business.

    Thank You!!!!

  15. March 19, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    Videos and pictorial images appealing to prurient interests should be restricted.

    Prurient:

    1. having, inclined to have, or characterized by lascivious or lustful thoughts, desires, etc.
    2. causing lasciviousness or lust.
    3. having a restless desire or longing.

    Prurient: Inordinately interested in matters of sex; lascivious.

    Lascivious: Characterized by an inordinate interest in sex: prurient thoughts.
    Arousing or appealing to an inordinate interest in sex.

    1. inclined to lustfulness; wanton; lewd
    2. arousing sexual desire: lascivious photographs.
    3. indicating sexual interest or expressive of lust or lewdness: a lascivious gesture.
    Given to or expressing lust; lecherous.
    Exciting sexual desires; salacious.

    reflecting or producing sexual desire or behavior esp. that is considered indecent or obscene

    SO, ILLICIT PORN WOULD BE NUDE (USUALLY) IMAGES OR VIDEOS WHICH ARE GIVEN TO OR EXPRESSING OF OR INCITING TO LUST, LECHEROUS, SALACIOUS, EXCITING SEXUAL DESIRES, INDECENT, OBSCENE, LEWD, LASCIVIOUS.–NUDES PORTRAYING SEXUAL ACTIVITY.

    Depictions of sexual acts that should occur only behind closed doors and out of the eyes of children, the public, the neighbors and the relatives.

    100 years ago, the towns would discourage such sales in respectable establishments. You didn’t have the porn magazines at every neighborhood store.

    I admit, I was used to a more decent America, growing up in the 50’s –sure they had their dysfunctional families and their crimes and their molesting priests (always) –but there was a culture of decency upheld by leading citizens and the mainstream values were traditional family values. We were more shock-able. Now, nothing is shocking.

    The perverse , shameful, unmentionable and unthinkable have become commonplace features of “liberty.”

  16. March 19, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    People get into this stuff, Manco, because it’s THERE! and curiosity kills the cat!
    People are tempt-able creatures. We can’t remove all temptation–but we could reduce the chances of young people getting addicted to addictive behaviors and substances if they were not so prevalent and easy to get.

    I’m concerned that my daughter won’t find a decent husband because all of them are like Manco! Time was, when a girl could find a virginal young man of strong character to marry–whose personal habits would not bring grief to his wife and children. those men are scarce as hen’s teeth –especially as one gets older.

  17. 17 Manco
    March 19, 2008 at 10:46 pm

    Send your daughter to me, Barb, I’ll take real good care of her. Ask anyone: I’m the most chivalrous bastard on the planet. I am an A-1 ladies man. Sure, I busted a few guts and had a few flings and tossed a few cookies but I’m an upstanding man, I sure am. Your real problem with me is that I don’t buy into your religious superstition and totalitarian thought process. It’s called an open mind, Barb. Try it some time.

    Manco likes the Christian daughters
    Christian daughters, Christian daughters
    Manco likes the Christian daughters
    and their repressed ways.

    Manco likes to flip their pies
    flip their pies, flip their pies
    Manco likes to flips their pies
    and send them on their way.

    Manco’s gonna marry your daughter
    marry your daughter, marry your daughter
    Manco’s gonna marry your daughter
    and take her money away.

    HEHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHEHEWOOOOOOOOOO

    This is the way the fucking world ends. Look at this fucking shit we’re in man. Not with a bang, but with a whimper. And with a whimper, I’m fucking splitting, Jack.

  18. 18 Willard
    March 19, 2008 at 11:11 pm

    Saigon… shit; I’m still only in Saigon… Every time I think I’m gonna wake up back in the jungle. When I was home after my first tour, it was worse. I’d wake up and there’d be nothing. I hardly said a word to my wife, until I said “yes” to a divorce. When I was here, I wanted to be there; when I was there, all I could think of was getting back into the jungle. I’m here a week now… waiting for a mission… getting softer; every minute I stay in this room, I get weaker, and every minute Charlie squats in the bush, he gets stronger. Each time I looked around, the walls moved in a little tighter.

  19. March 20, 2008 at 12:24 am

    You know, Manco (are you sure you’re not a JP alias, saving him from boredom?)

    The problem with the person Manco is that HE is the closed-minded one. Closed to truth about himself and the true nature of liberty. It isn’t freedom to buy coke and porn, etc. That’s slavery –a total waste of time and life and health and future.

  20. 20 Manco
    March 20, 2008 at 12:57 am

    Barb: I am what you can never be and it eats you alive for you feel the bars and the enclosed space and you realize at long last that your life, the one thing you need to make sense, is little more than a prison cell of your own design that has shaped you into the vapid, soulless entity you have now become and shall be forever more.

    For the last time: I am not Johnny Peppers. Johnny is the creator of this blog and the owner of a pock-marked, meth-damaged dome who likes to torture squirrels and parade around his home in stolen women’s undergarments. He’s a sick fuck, and I’m only a moderately sick fuck. Get it right, Barbarino.

    I am curious about one thing. This has tugged at me for some time but I always forgot to ask. You are so certain that your husband – light of your life and protector of your loins – has never looked at a naughty book or shanked the crank looking at gyrating, nubile young females moving up and down on a male member or caressing their own lovely little areas. You are certain of that and why should I waste my time in trying to make you realize your husband is scum, like most men. If he had an ounce of self-worth he’d cut the charade, throw back the hollow part in the back of the closet and allow his mountains of smut to come pouring forth like some therapeutic river.
    But, okay, you say he doesn’t look or long after other women. Okay. So he doesn’t look at anything disturbing or sinful. With that in mind, my dear, what does he think of you making daily visits to this website where music and conversation and ideas generally center around the worldly and sinful? Doe she know or care that you seem to go out of your way to visit the online home of a wack job with a penchant for old ladies, their undergarments and their bank accounts. I would like to know. When he hears you jamming out to The Misfits or reads the maniacal comments that you seem to take great joy in reading yourself every day, what does he think or ask you? Does he perhaps think in vain that the veil has been lifted and his own fuck dreams about the young waitress at the restaurant down the street is now acceptable?

    Let us into your world, Barb. Hah hah hahaha. You see, Barb, true insanity is never having to say you’re sorry. Hahahahaa.

  21. March 20, 2008 at 11:10 am

    O you are a sick dude –a product of our demented culture in freefall. There still are godly men. I’m sure he’s had a lustful thought now and then –but the man doesn’t give himself time to wallow. I used to be an insecure wife because he was and still is a devastatingly handsome man (one of his MA’s was overheard to agree with a patient over the phone that he surely was “eye candy” as the patient had said.) I never was a top of the line beauty myself. I have come to trust him completely and he couldn’t be a better husband to a less deserving wife — in that he didn’t get a domestic diva with House Beautiful skills and youthful energies and a petite physique. But he says I am like a Reubens model! — if you know your art nudes! He’s never failed to find me desireable, though Playboy would never beat down my door –not even for the chasing chubbies issue if they had one. he has seen Playboy –told me years ago when someone left one in his ER quarters when he was working there. He was raised to be chaste–raised on Proverbs of the Bible and on good preaching. He didn’t sow the wild oats –I met him at Christian college. His best friends were all people who did not “wink” at sin and wouldn’t have smut in their dorm rooms because they took their Christianity seriously.

    I was his first and only, ever in his life. So all thoughts of sex come home. He said he’d have to be out of his mind to risk our marriage, harm our children by infidelity to me, set a bad example for them, and risk His soul. Not that repented sins aren’t forgiven, but when you gleefully cross the line to adultery or other illicit sex, at what point do you really repent? and feel the remorse needed for God’s forgiveness? Too many in today’s culture only feel remorseful and turn on the waterworks when they are caught. Another thing, he hates computers and said if he caught his sons looking at the porn, he’d destroy the computer. He hates their intrusion into his job –waiting on windows for his charting. He knows nothing about other computer use –for google, email, etc.

    He is not the verbal person; I am. He does know about my blogging –I read him what I write sometimes. I showed him Johnny Peeper’s alleged picture. JP looks exactly like a Calvinist, Baptist CPA who used to go to our church, by the way –except for the distorted forehead.

    I don’t take great joy in reading maniacal comments and foul language –I can appreciate humor, however, and clever creativity–but not blasphemy or the obscene.
    I wander to and fro in blogosphere searching for interesting people with interesting topics about which I have opinions –views –and sometimes, even knowledge –or at least, a Biblical perspective. Right now, on my blog, my son has a great comment about my article titled “Why Hetero Marriage Should Have the Parades.”

    I appreciate that blogging gives us chances to have discussions with people whose paths we wouldn’t normally cross –and we can speak about serious issues and religious/cultural concerns in a way we would not do in politically correct, polite venues, where religion and politics are avoided because of the emotions raised.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    “But he says I am like a Reubens model! — if you know your art nudes!”

    For hundreds of years, nude art was a form of pre-Internet erotic entertainment. These ribald images of naked and indecent flesh caused many erections and brought lustful sin into the hearts of the viewer. Based on your earlier comments, do you recommend that we ban artistic nudes since they fit the definition you provided?

    And just so you know, Paul Reubens was caught with child pornography in his home. I would not want my husband giving me that kind of compliment. Does he go to matinees downtown?

  22. March 20, 2008 at 11:27 am

    Also, hubby seeks food for the soul –is always tuned into the Christian radio stations –from the time he gets up (radio in the shower and by the bed and in the kitchen and in the car and when he works alone at the office –I have dropped in there and worked there occasionally myself –and he has never ever lapsed morally with other women at work or elsewhere as so many are rumored to do –but actually, there are many trustworthy men like him who are loyal husbands –just not on TV or in the movies or in politics, I guess. )

    He loves Christian music. (not country gospel, much, however) Listens to the national Christian choir on Sunday nights when he goes over his labs. He makes sure he sings in church choir and whenever his daughters need him for church music, which my girls and I are responsible for. He has a beautiful voice –a very blessed man with a truly inferior wife, in my humble low self esteem–however, I think I’m a decent, if stodgy and predictable, writer , useful church musician–and I do have a sense of humor and I do have my children’s affection and respect –and I did a pretty good job mothering. (I do tell myself these things which are true to keep up my spirits –because I could tend toward self-pity at my limitations and shortcomings in comparisons to his strengths. But I’ve been there and done that.

    My advice to any woman who feels inferior (and so many do) is to remember that there is nothing more unappealing in a friend or a spouse than a self-pitying sadsack needing constant reassurance. AT the same time, men, sincere reassurance is easy to give and costs nothing –and pays big dividends to the relationship.

  23. March 20, 2008 at 10:48 pm

    No matinees, Johnny. We only had art appreciation –and noted that the standard of beauty of the old artists was a buxom babe. So I know what he means, and that’s all that counts.

    dictionary says: Rubenesque “said of a woman’s body,” “rounded and plump,” 1913, of the type characteristic of the paintings of Flem. painter Sir Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640).

    I don’t see the old nude art as being very “erotic” but what you say is true, I’m sure. Artists have always taken artistic liberty to depict nudity in their work –and I’ve found it hard to imagine how male art students can view nude women, especially, in class, and remain dispassionate. But I guess it’s like the doctors doing exams. The clinical takes over.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    There is no such thing as the “clinical taking over.” Men’s brains are hard-wired to respond to sexual stimuli. The fact that it is a clinical setting does not alter this auto-reflexive chemical response.

    Many male OB/Gyns and even GPs wear erection sheaths. Those are cloth slings that attach to the upper thigh. When an attractive female patient disrobes or has her bits inspected, the hardened penis fills the sling and is not as noticeable.

  24. March 21, 2008 at 9:40 am

    O for pete’s sake, JP, I never heard of such a thing, though I suppose they exist –and you are wrong about the inevitability of erections upon all visual stimuli. don’t you know that men can’t think and erect at the same time? HA! The porn one gets used to, no longer stimulates, thus the escalation of harder core porn to get the same rush. I would suppose that clinical settings are so common place that erotica is not the effect. Besides, care is taken to protect the dignity and modesty of the patient and there is a 3rd party witness to personal exams. And medical personnel also get fast at what they’re doing.

    It is never erotic to have female exams, I can tell you–it’s not an erotic setting –only in the imaginations of those who aren’t undergoing or performing the procedures. “Playing doctor” sounds like fun –but in the real clinical setting, it’s all “business” for the normal people. Granted there are the abnormal -the seducers and the molesters who are thinking about sex instead of their business at hand.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    Let us agree to disagree about the male homo sapien’s automatic sexual stimuli response. Maybe you do not perceive female exams as erotic, but many licensed and practicing doctors do. They love nothing more than being in a position of power over a vulnerable undressed female patient. I wish not to post any links, but you can find numerous doctor/patient fetish websites out there that corroborate this phenomenon. Many of the viewers leave comments identifying themselves as doctors and nurses.

    For many sexual deviants, the medical arena is the perfect place to engage in their fetishes. They use micro-cameras attached to their smocks to record their nude patients (victims). In this case a doctor carved his school’s alma mater (Kentucky University) in a woman’s uterus. These are sick people Barb. If you believe they are not out there treating women everyday, you are deluding yourself.

  25. March 21, 2008 at 9:45 am

    A guy once told me that “nothing is stimulating about nudity found in a museum.” That might not be so for a 14 year old boy, but for grownups. So I reinforce my thesis –that not ALL nudity is inevitably erotic.

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    ” I reinforce my thesis –that not ALL nudity is inevitably erotic.”

    Which reinforces your theory that erotic material should be criminalized. In other words, you want to usher in the American Taliban. I prefer freedom of choice and conscious. Imposing religious beliefs and spirituality by legislation, or at the point of a gun, is tyrannical. Liberty requires freedom from state and religious compulsion.

  26. March 21, 2008 at 10:59 am

    There are evil people in every profession, but I believe they are in the minority still. As for your fetish websites –what makes you think ANY of them are really medical professionals? “playing doctor” is erotic –being one is less so. a real doc knows he can’t afford the lawsuits of such hanky panky. A seductress could lead him right out of his retirement fund. Most doctors are too smart to take such risks –and the ones I know are pretty honorable people –yes, there are the crooked ones. I know 2 who are philanderers–both foreign.

    I don’t think it’s the Taliban to restrict the manufacture and sale of definitely pornographic material.

  27. March 21, 2008 at 11:02 am

    How do you happen to come across such a website, anyway, johnny Peepers? Jeepers Creepers! a Christian nursery song goes like this:

    Be careful little eyes what you see
    be careful little [peepers] what you see
    for your father up above is looking down in love
    so be careful little eyes what you see.

    and be carefull little hands what you do

    and feet, where you go

    ears, what you hear

    mouth, what you say –etc. etc..

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    In my previous life, I was steeped in sin. I saw many things that torment me to this day. The evil in this World is real.

  28. March 21, 2008 at 11:09 am

    I don’t think it’s about religious or spiritual compulsion to agree that porn is bad, and that “there oughtta be a law” –just like we used to have laws against gambling and other vices and drugs which become addictive and harmful, expensive, taking food off the family tables — I feel that way about nicotine and alcohol, also. And unwholesome tv programming.

    But I know it would be no fun to be a morality police state in a culture that has gone too far the other direction in the name of liberty –just one huge headache. Better to convert everyone through powerful preaching and the power of the Holy Spirit. but even then –it is hard for the Christians to stay pure in a sinful culture.

    Alcohol is an example –people don’t want prohibition –in part because the historians say it failed –it failed to keep everybody from drinking but it helped many to avoid alcoholism, alcohol related traffic accidents and family violence and the incest, so often influenced by alcohol-induced dulling of inhibitions. There wasn’t as much college binge drinking and people waking up the next morning unable to recall what they had done.

  29. March 21, 2008 at 3:52 pm

    As for the evil in this world, you are right. We see into that world on tv if not in our own daily experiences.

  30. 30 Kurtz
    March 21, 2008 at 11:35 pm

    Have you ever considered any real freedoms? Freedoms from the opinion of others… even the opinions of yourself?
    I’ve seen horrors… horrors that you’ve seen. But you have no right to call me a murderer. You have a right to kill me. You have a right to do that… but you have no right to judge me. It’s impossible for words to describe what is necessary to those who do not know what horror means. Horror. Horror has a face… and you must make a friend of horror. Horror and moral terror are your friends. If they are not then they are enemies to be feared. They are truly enemies. I remember when I was with Special Forces. Seems a thousand centuries ago. We went into a camp to inoculate the children. We left the camp after we had inoculated the children for Polio, and this old man came running after us and he was crying. He couldn’t see. We went back there and they had come and hacked off every inoculated arm. There they were in a pile. A pile of little arms. And I remember… I… I… I cried. I wept like some grandmother. I wanted to tear my teeth out. I didn’t know what I wanted to do. And I want to remember it. I never want to forget it. I never want to forget. And then I realized… like I was shot… like I was shot with a diamond… a diamond bullet right through my forehead. And I thought: My God… the genius of that. The genius. The will to do that. Perfect, genuine, complete, crystalline, pure. And then I realized they were stronger than we. Because they could stand that these were not monsters. These were men… trained cadres. These men who fought with their hearts, who had families, who had children, who were filled with love… but they had the strength… the strength… to do that. If I had ten divisions of those men our troubles here would be over very quickly. You have to have men who are moral… and at the same time who are able to utilize their primordial instincts to kill without feeling… without passion… without judgment… without judgment. Because it’s judgment that defeats us.
    We must kill them. We must incinerate them. Pig after pig. Cow after cow. Village after village. Army after army. I watched a snail crawl along the edge of a straight razor. That’s my dream. That’s my nightmare. Crawling, slithering, along the edge of a straight… razor… and surviving. What do you call assassins who accuse assassins?
    We train young men to drop fire on people. But their commanders won’t allow them to write “fuck” on their airplanes because it’s obscene!
    I worry that my son might not understand what I’ve tried to be. And if I were to be killed, I would want someone to go to my home and tell my son everything. Everything I did, everything you saw, because there’s nothing that I detest more than the stench of lies. And if you understand me, you will do this for me.

  31. 32 Dennis
    March 26, 2008 at 9:24 am

    Barb: I’m a photojournalist for Time-Life. I’ve had the pleasure to meet Kurtz. Hey, man, you don’t talk to the Colonel. You listen to him. The man’s enlarged my mind. He’s a poet-warrior in the classic sense. I mean sometimes he’ll… uh… well, you’ll say “hello” to him, right? And he’ll just walk right by you. He won’t even notice you. And suddenly he’ll grab you, and he’ll throw you in a corner, and he’ll say, “do you know that ‘if’ is the middle word in life? If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you, if you can trust yourself when all men doubt you”… I mean I’m no, I can’t… I’m a little man, I’m a little man, he’s… he’s a great man. I should have been a pair of ragged claws scuttling across floors of silent seas…
    What are they gonna say about him? What are they gonna say? That he was a kind man? That he was a wise man? That he had plans? That he had wisdom? Bullshit man!
    He likes you because you’re still alive. One through nine, no maybes, no supposes, no fractions. You can’t travel in space, you can’t go out into space, you know, without, like, you know, uh, with fractions – what are you going to land on – one-quarter, three-eighths? What are you going to do when you go from here to Venus or something? That’s dialectic physics.
    There’s mines over there, there’s mines over there, and watch out those goddamn monkeys bite, I’ll tell ya. The heads. You’re looking at the heads. Sometimes he goes too far. He’s the first one to admit it.
    I wish I had words, man. I wish I had words… I can tell ya something like the other day he wanted to kill me. Somethin’ like that… Because I took his picture. He said “If you take my picture again, I’m gonna kill you.” And he *meant* it.
    This is the way the fucking world ends. Look at this fucking shit we’re in man. Not with a bang, but with a whimper. And with a whimper, I’m fucking splitting, Jack.

  32. March 26, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    JP, I hope you’re making money writing! YOu’re good!

    Johnnypeeper’s response:

    The only compensation I crave is the love and adoration that I receive from the seasoned Christian lovelies such as yourself.

  33. 34 chrimsonghost_lodi,nj
    June 24, 2010 at 5:39 am

    hey man, i like how u post the music and lyrics up and when ppl come on to give thier oppinion u reply with great responses and never lose ur head, i love to see a fan after all these years thats level headed./
    g.d.

  34. 35 chrimsonghost_lodi,nj
    June 24, 2010 at 5:43 am

    if only u knew what we were about, u could actually devise a better post. just b/c my music has lyrical falue far greater than some minds can calculate, doesnt mean its satanic, i embrace both my light and dark side.
    g.d.

  35. 36 Anonymous
    June 24, 2010 at 5:47 am

    fuck god u stupid bitches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    BURN THE BABY<
    KILL THE FATHER
    AND CALLN THE FUCKIN GHOST BUSTA ON THAT HOLY FAG OF A SPIRIT


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Johnny Peepers

----> is a socio-pathetic degenerate with a penchant for cheap booze, ruphy-laden broads, and dim sum soup.

a

Blog Stats

  • 1,061,518 hits

Archives


%d bloggers like this: