04
Dec
08

The Great Leader Speaks With Charlie Gibson

bush

GIBSON: You’ve always said there’s no do-overs as President. If you had one?

BUSH: I don’t know — the biggest regret of all the presidency has to have been the intelligence failure in Iraq. A lot of people put their reputations on the line and said the weapons of mass destruction is a reason to remove Saddam Hussein. It wasn’t just people in my administration; a lot of members in Congress, prior to my arrival in Washington D.C., during the debate on Iraq, a lot of leaders of nations around the world were all looking at the same intelligence. And, you know, that’s not a do-over, but I wish the intelligence had been different, I guess.

GIBSON: If the intelligence had been right, would there have been an Iraq war?

BUSH: Yes, because Saddam Hussein was unwilling to let the inspectors go in to determine whether or not the U.N. resolutions were being upheld. In other words, if he had had weapons of mass destruction, would there have been a war? Absolutely.

GIBSON: No, if you had known he didn’t.

BUSH: Oh, I see what you’re saying. You know, that’s an interesting question. That is a do-over that I can’t do. It’s hard for me to speculate.

You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on ~ George W. Bush


5 Responses to “The Great Leader Speaks With Charlie Gibson”


  1. December 5, 2008 at 4:22 am

    Liar.. They gave power to Saddam Hussain and they fired him. I think he is the most hated guy in the world.. After his father.. A wonderful family they are..

    P.S: Have you heard about the documentary by Christian Amanpour, about chemical bombing the Iraqi Kurdistan (Halabcheh)? She indirectly pointed US government of that time to be guilty for giving chemical bombs to Saddam Hussain..

  2. December 5, 2008 at 6:43 pm

    “And, you know, that’s not a do-over, but I wish the intelligence had been different, I guess.”

    6 years of lost lives; 6 years of unnecessary war, based on falty intelligence (or so they say) and he guesses?

    This animosity toward Sadam started over a woman; I don’t care what anyone says. . . but perhaps I’m suffering from accute, Schizifrinia (sp) paranoid style!

    Hope all has been well for you brother! Keep keeping us informed and above else, keep keeping it real!

    Peace, Light and Love. . . CordieB.

  3. 3 Manco
    December 6, 2008 at 1:05 am

    “That is a do-over?” How old is this fucking idiot, 10?

    You can’t do-over mass murder, you psychopathic son-of-a-bitch!

  4. December 7, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    “Yes, because Saddam Hussein was unwilling to let the inspectors go in to determine whether or not the U.N. resolutions were being upheld.” bullshit

  5. December 14, 2008 at 3:13 am

    Shahrzad: U.S. military and financial support of Sadaam’s regime is a long story. Rumsfeld’s handshake sealed the deal for the U.S./Iran proxy war in the early 80’s. The U.S. government turned a blind eye to the Kurdish chemical warfare war crimes for political expediency.

    cordieb: Psychopaths are rarely able to acknowledge mistakes. I dunno about this debacle being about a woman, but you never know.

    Manco: History will judge this imbecile harshly.

    qazse: You got to give the moron credit – he can stick to a 5 year old script pretty well.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Johnny Peepers

----> is a socio-pathetic degenerate with a penchant for cheap booze, ruphy-laden broads, and dim sum soup.

a

Blog Stats

  • 1,067,081 hits

Archives


%d bloggers like this: